The main witness breaks down during the trial of How To Murder Your Husband author Nancy Brophy for the murder of her husband.

This article is automatically translated from the original language to your language. Do not hesitate to let us know if it contains translation errors so that we can correct them as soon as possible.

For weeks, during the trial of an Oregon romance novelist accused of killing her husband, a cook, the question arose as to whether a witness who shared a prison bedroom with Nancy Brophy would testify and later tell detectives that she described herself. herself as “so far away” (arms outstretched) from her husband when he was shot.

As attorneys for the prosecution and defense argued over whether or not witness Anndrea Jacobs should testify, Multnomah County Judge Christopher Ramras previously ruled that she could only do so if Brophy’s attorneys produced corroborating evidence, the state did. I would call a “rebuttal”. witness” to suppress certain information presented by the defense. On Wednesday, attorneys for Brophy asked what exactly Jacobs would refute.

Jacobs “would refute the claim that [Brophy] didn’t kill her husband,” Assistant District Attorney Shawn Overstreet said, testifying “that they were so far apart when she shot her husband.”

Only that’s not exactly what Jacobs testified after Multnomah County Judge Christopher Ramras tried her. will be able allowed to take a stand.

Jacobs said Brophy showed him a copy. people magazine when the two shared a bedroom at the Multnomah County Jail and offered to read an article about the case. Jacobs said she suggested that Brophy might “use the media” to find out who killed her husband, Dan Brophy, and Nancy Brophy responded that it was unnecessary.

“She said she didn’t have to prove who killed her husband,” Jacobs said. “She just had to worry about proving that she didn’t know.”

As for the “so far” statement, Jacobs described it:

“She told me she was shot twice in the heart,” Jacobs said. “She showed me the distance from her, she said she was approximate and used the extension of her arm. I said, ‘Wow, that must have been pretty close.’ She said, ‘Well, it was around that time.’

“Did he say anything about his involvement?” Overstreet asked.

“The first time we spoke, he slipped and started saying ‘me,’ but then he went to ‘that,’ and said, ‘That was the furthest thing.'”

In other words, it’s not exactly a confession. But that didn’t stop Brophy’s attorney, Lisa Maxfield, from questioning the witness about what she might have been promised in exchange for her testimony. Jacobs was an accountant who was convicted of criminal fraud after embezzling more than $1.1 million from the medical and dental practices where she worked and sentenced to four years in prison. Jacobs faces new Medicare fraud charges, the court announced today. Maxfield went to great lengths to get Jacobs to admit that her testimony was in hope of some kind of leniency. She suggested that the Portland police detective who interviewed Jacobs in April promised her that if she cooperated in the case, she “could be useful to him.”

“His offer was even a little better,” Maxfield said. “He told you that you didn’t even have to testify if you didn’t want to. He totally depended on you. But he said that we will not play this game until we hear the information from him. What game are you thinking of playing?

“I don’t know,” Jacobs replied.

“You were hoping your Medicaid case would go away,” Maxfield said.

“No,” Jacobs answered.

At the end of his testimony, Jacobs insisted that he had no desire to get involved in this case, that he had nothing to gain from it, and that, in fact, he had received several threats at the Texas prison camp where he is currently being held. . “It’s not easy, and the worst thing about incarceration is testifying against another inmate,” Jacobs said. “There’s a certain code of ethics when you’re in person and in prison.”

The case appears to be drawing to a close, with the defense resting on Wednesday morning and the state calling its rebuttal witnesses in the afternoon. Then come the closing arguments and the verdict. Key Witness Fails Trial Of How To Murder Your Husband Author Nancy Brophy For Her Husband’s Murder

This article is automatically translated from the original language to your language. Do not hesitate to let us know if it contains translation errors so that we can correct them as soon as possible.

  • Add Your Comment